Devon C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was entirely created by now-retired User:Lobsterthermidor. As explained here, his contributions, though well-intentioned, were problematical due to the persistent integration of original research among the referenced parts, making it very difficult to disentangle the reliable content from his own interpretations, speculation, personal opinions and comments.

Until this issue can be resolved, readers should treat the article with caution and should do their own research to verify any information they take from here.  —SMALLJIM  12:21, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cowick, Devon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20130423201639/http://www.spreyton.org.uk/history_domesday_to_1912.htm to http://www.spreyton.org.uk/history_domesday_to_1912.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:48, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

One of the references used in this article is Richardson I 2011, p. 538. There is no more information about this and as it stands, I can't track it down. If someone else can provide more details (in particular a title!) and can add it into the article, that would be great.--NHSavage (talk) 14:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]