This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted on 5 January 2012 by reviewer Alpha Quadrant (talk · contribs). Weather: Non-tropical Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Non-tropical storms task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Who designated this storm "Patrick"? In Sweden and Norway it was called "Dagmar", and a comparison of Google searchs for storm+Patrick+2011 and storm+Dagmar+2011 tells its own story. If you try storm+Patrick+norway+sweden+finland+estonia you land up only with this article, while if you try storm+Dagmar+norway+sweden+finland+estonia you get many more relevant ones. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.169.131.14 (talk) 14:16, 6 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Patrick is the OFFICIAL name of the storm. I thought you would have noticed that. Bruvtakesover (T|C) 20:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Official by what criteria? I have not noticed and seemingly not the first who commented. --LPfi (talk) 07:48, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have changed the name of the article to Dagmar, since more damage was caused in Scandinavia than any other area. See Per (storm). Bruvtakesover (T|C) 15:49, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is the value of damaged property right? According to finnish Wikipedia the storm caused damage of $130 million in Finland alone.84.250.173.42 (talk) 18:01, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The image is dated to 23 December 2011 on Nasa's Worldview, a full 24 hours before the development of the storm as referenced in the text. I don't think it is relevant to the article, we have at best a baroclinic leaf structure, at worst a homogeneous blob of cloud which is thousands of miles away from the regions affected, a full day before it is stated to develop in the text. The storm, if this is what is represented (which I don't think it is) underwent significant meteorological development after this image. I think the image has no context to the storm. In this case, no image is indeed better than this one. It certainly does not show the storm as a mature cyclone, and given the date, not at lowest pressure or peak intensity. The image doesn't show any features of an extratropical cyclone, and doesn't illustrate the article in any meaningful way for instance; comma cloud, possible sting jet cloud structures, dry slot, general shapiro-keyser life stages for it to be useful.Lacunae (talk) 17:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]