This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dan Nichols has written many songs sung in Jewish camps and youth groups across the country. He is very much notable. He is considered a "Jewish Rock Star." I am in the process of finding citations for my "preeminent" claim within the article. Please give this article a chance. Seriously. Jbbdude (talk) 15:44, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Etrangere (talk) 01:10, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
Keep I've attempted to clean up the article, and will do further clean up, but I am tired now. Dan Nichols is popular among Jewish circles, performing at summer camps, synagogues around the country, and has performed Union for Reform Judaism Biennials (2001-2009) and North American Federation of Temple Youth conventions.[1] He is mentioned in the articles for those organizations as being notable, and appears on all of NFTY's Ruach compilation CDs.[2] Kiddo27 (talk) 05:36, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete This person may be well known among a certain, limited, cultural segment of the populous but in general is not particularly notable in the mainstream populous nor the mainstream press. The sources attributed in this article (aside from the L.A. Times sole citation), are not of non-bias editorial nature. There are many people who are "popular" but whose specific activities are not of note or particular interest in terms of the general public, and thus should not be included in an encyclopedic article.
Etrangere (talk) 18:13, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Published in newspapers:
The article has improved somewhat. The additional "mainstream", editorial references have increased but are not cited properly. I have to leave my vote at Delete until a few more citations (with links or retrieval dates) are added. Notability is still questionable. Will check in again to see if there are anymore verifiable citations.
Etrangere (talk) 02:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. Appreciate the feedback. I've made the suggested corrections, and will continue to improve the article. Kiddo27 (talk) 04:16, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Keep
Etrangere (talk) 22:23, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Which is it, 7 or 9? Olivia comet (talk) 02:16, 16 July 2019 (UTC)