GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Another Believer (talk · contribs) 15:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Averageuntitleduser (talk · contribs) 12:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One can never review to many drag queen GANs, excited to work with you again! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 12:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Well-written[edit]

Did a bit of copy-editing, and here's what I'm left with:

Verifiable with no original research[edit]

Essentially all sources are reliable. As a student publication, The Columbia Chronicle and Indiana Daily Student are fine for events in their community (their uses are also uncontroversial), the Yahoo! Life article isn't syndicated, and Pride.com and Screen Rant, which are mildly reliable, are primarily used for attributed opinion. No issues with close paraphrasing during my spot-check. The Screen Rant quote brings the Earwig score to 43% (27% in second place), but I believe its use is justified, it would be hard to express their sheer positivity another way. For the record, I paraphrased one part of The Columbia Chronicle quote.

Spot-check[edit]

Broad in its coverage[edit]

I've done a whole lot of looking for sources. Ritz seems on the more popular end of drag queens, considering how many mentions she has received over the years about her lip-sync. But, I think the article does a great job of balancing this with the other aspects of her time on Drag Race, and her other activities in general; there are some really great finds. The most detailed unused sources are drama ones, which... yeah no.

Neutral[edit]

Neutral as can be.

Stable[edit]

No recent content disputes or edit wars.

Illustrated[edit]

The two Flickr images are informative and correctly labeled as Creative Commons.

Summary[edit]

I don't think I'll ever stop being enamored by these; great work and happy Easter! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 20:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Averageuntitleduser Much appreciated! ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:01, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I like the fixes; I am now happy to promote this article! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 00:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.