A fact from Digital HiNote appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 October 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Digital pulled their HiNote Ultra laptop out of a manila envelope on television nearly 15 years before Apple did the same?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
PhotographyEdits five days have passed since you left that note, but I don't believe any progress has been made. I'll archive this nomination shortly if nothing is done. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 07:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
ALT1:... that Digital pulled their HiNote Ultra laptop out of a manila envelope on television nearly 15 years before Apple? Source: "Valleywag, via an anonymous tipster, reports that the "manila envelope" reveal for a small laptop is far from new. DEC, if the tipster's memory serves, used the same wowser technique to show off a HiNote Ultra—almost 15 years ago. This thing looks somewhat ungainly now. But it was, as the ad copy tells us, only an inch thick." (Wired) DigitalIceAge (talk) 01:26, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There are several citations to PR Newswire which are promotional articles from the company per WP:PRSOURCE. I think these are not ever acceptable for DYK, but this did pass a GA review so I will ask for input on the DYK talk page. SL93 (talk) 06:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I did more research and it looks to be acceptable in this case so - new enough, long enough, and no copyright violations. A QPQ is not needed. The hook is directly cited. The image is fine. SL93 (talk) 06:56, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]