The contents of the Disrupt Asia page were merged into Information and Communication Technology Agency of Sri Lanka#Disrupt Asia on 22 November 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.

Sri Lanka Redirect‑class

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles Redirect This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Festivals NA‑class

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Festivals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Festivals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FestivalsWikipedia:WikiProject FestivalsTemplate:WikiProject FestivalsFestivals articles NA This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This redirect is written in Sri Lankan English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from American English or other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Eesan1969: My last edit summary didn't properly address the first of your two. You are correct that citations shouldn't be deleted without caution. I reviewed all that I deleted, and the writing did not seem to be journalistic in nature. I'd be happy to discuss specific instances if you like. —jameslucas ^{▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄} 20:32, 25 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

JamesLucas: Maybe the content might be not journalistic in nature, but they appeared in the leading English newspapers of Sri Lanka.Eesan1969 (talk) 00:28, 26 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Eesan1969: It’s frustrating that some newspapers publish proper journalism side-by-side with press releases, and even more frustrating that those newspapers are sometimes more widely read than more scrupulous newspapers. Fortunately, there are some quick and easy ways to detect fake journalism that work most of the time. Just now I picked at random one of the deleted references to double check: "ICTA's 'Disrupt Asia 2018' showcases advanced assistive technologies for persons with disabilities". Daily FT. September 4, 2018. Retrieved August 2, 2020. This is the first paragraph:

The 2018 edition of Disrupt Asia, Sri Lanka’s premier start-up conference and innovation festival, was successfully concluded recently at the Trace – Expert City with the participation of a large number of organisations and individuals connected to the growing startup industry in Sri Lanka.

Right away, the adjective ‘premiere’ and the adverb ‘successfully’ raised big red flags that I was reading promotional material, not journalism. The next thing I looked for was a byline, and there is none. The lack of an author’s name suggests either that no one was willing to stake their reputation on being associated with the content, or the author couldn’t be disclosed because she or he has a conflict of interest.

For a more on this, I recommend visiting WP:NEWSORG. The line about ‘churnalism’ is most relevant here, but the whole thing may be of interest to you. I’m also available if you have questions. —jameslucas ^{▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄} 12:06, 26 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

JamesLucas:Thanks for your detail explanation and information sources.Eesan1969 (talk) 10:57, 30 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]