This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Rivers High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Germany: Hamburg High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Hamburg task force (assessed as Top-importance). Czech Republic High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

The actual length of the Elbe is 1,091 km (1,165 is out of date). Please compare the german article. -- Fice, March 26, 2006.

It looks like there are many results for 1165 and 1091, I thought both measurements could be used -- Astrokey44|talk 23:06, 26 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Whatever can "The Elbe has been navigable by commercial vessels since 1842" mean? --Pfold 14:30, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If your German is fluent, a translation of German Wikipedia article Elbe would be a huge improvement here. This is an important river: it deserves full, deep coverage. --06:25, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

I wonder why the Polish and Sorbian names are mentioned. Both live quite a few miles away from the river? 84.181.94.136 08:27, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorbs used to live as far west as Saale. Also, Drawehn name could be added. 37.190.156.25 (talk) 00:46, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well Germans used to live all over eastern europe, infact they created big parts of it before they were robbed. I think going by your logic it's only fair if we mention a German name for any river in eastern europe then, right? Yeah probably wouldn't fly with the radical leftists on here lol but still... 178.24.246.119 (talk) 14:47, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

After looking at an Anglo-Saxon dictionary, I discovered that the Old English name for the Elbe was Elf, whereas the Latin name was Albus. This was interesting because both names go back to 'light': I believe such an etymology as Scandinavian älv for 'river' is inadequate - I prefer this version: Proto-Germanic *albhiz ('river of light' or 'dwelling of the Elf spirit' or 'sacred, worshipping river').

78.151.173.120 (talk) 11:59, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Albus comes from Lithuanian word for light or white 'baltus' and from that word originates 'balus/bale' which means a puddle/bog...from there Czeck word 'labe' and finaly 'elbe'.78.151.173.120 (talk) 11:59, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have begun working on translating the German article on the Elbe which is a featured article. My work (which will probably be slow) can be found at my sandbox User:Jieagles/Sandbox. Please feel free to help by translating a section, checking the translation, copyediting, commenting, &c. Ill start integrating stuff once the translation is done. Jieagles (talk) 21:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The fringe theory on Hitlers ashes should not be included in this article. Inwind (talk) 21:38, 30 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have removed the following paragraph, added by an anonymous contributor to the 'In the Czech Republic' subsection:

In the canal of Brunsbüttel, the Elbe River is approximately 21 metres (69 ft), in Děčín, Czech Republic, the river is 4.3 metres (14 ft). In town of Festung Königstein, Germany, the river depth rising 12 metres (39 ft).

as:

1. Neither Brunsbüttel nor Festung Königstein are in the Czech Republic
2. Except for the last sentence, it is not clear what the measurements are (depth/width)
3. No source is cited

-- Starbois (talk) 15:25, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Surely, it is the Northeast of the Czech Republic in which the Elbe (Labe) originates, not the Northwest. Beowulf (talk) 03:27, 15 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Elbe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore)) after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot)) to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121005054158/http://www.ancientlibrary.com/gazetteer/0367.html to http://www.ancientlibrary.com/gazetteer/0367.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Have some timelapse videos from a boat travelling by Elbe here. Who want, copy to Wikimedia Commons! Макс Поршнев (talk) 11:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elbe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110809060903/http://www.schiffswiki.de/index.php?id=180 to http://www.schiffswiki.de/index.php?id=180

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If Elbe is simply from the same source as Swedish älv etc., how come it became the name of such a huge river? Usually in Europe, when a river is called simply "river" or "water", it's either a very small one (Aa, Aach), or a borrowing (Úpa), or both (Avon). Also, the article about hydronyms says that the biggier the river, the older its name tends to be.

It's more likely that the exact "Elbe" form results from a semantic contamination / adideation / folk etymologization of the earlier name to the Germanic word. This original name has long been postulated to derive from something akin to Reconstruction:Proto-Celtic/albiyū (for want of better links at hand, 1 and mentions in 2). Since etymology is not, for objective reasons, an exact science, and the newer theories don't necessarily disprove the older ones, it would be good if someone included the traditional view, the way German Wikipedia does. 37.190.156.25 (talk) 00:38, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elbe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090331210501/http://www.hvv.de/en/about-us/public-transport-operators/ to http://www.hvv.de/en/about-us/public-transport-operators/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]