This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Social and political / Contemporary Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Social and political philosophy Contemporary philosophy Economics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Socialism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is this a wikipedia article or a student paper? I've read most of the first half hoping to find out what an exchange value actually *is*, and all I'm learning is what it *isn't*. Plus irrelevant asides about shiny cars that taste of lemons or somesuch bollocks.

Perhaps someone who knows what they're talking about might like to try their hands at a rewrite. It would be greatly appreciated

82.68.20.86 (talk) 13:10, 19 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article could do with more discussion of Adam Smith.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 14:49, 7 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The last section of this article, specifically the section about criticism against Marxist theory, reads like a college essay rather than an encyclopedia, and could be a legitimate target for NPOV concerns 130.49.61.248 (talk) 10:07, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ton of literature out there to draw on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.68.252 (talk) 07:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Exchange value. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081216230210/http://www.heartfield.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/economy.pdf to http://www.heartfield.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/economy.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:57, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

it tries to describe different aspects of value and it completely fails. 98.7.201.234 (talk) 06:19, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]