This article was nominated for deletion on 21 September 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. United States: Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American television task force. Journalism This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Brands This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Does anyone else think it's time to split off the table as its own article, something like "List of stations which have used the Eyewitness News title" or something along those lines?
- Hinto 00:49, 25 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think we should split the Eyewitness News Music segment from the main article. Does anyone concur?

WAVY 10WAVY 10 16:37, 1 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

According to the Southern Media source,KLBK-TV(a CBS station when I last checked)has started using this package... Ranma9617 07:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I for one agree with this. This Portion should be Split into one article. Highly because the News Music Package has been Highly used and it's highly in a different kind of field as it comes with a full newscast and the stations that used the moniker. The full newscast article and the music needs to be split!!!!

Csworldwide1 14:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

From my own experience and from this article there seems to be little written and nothing cited that accurately describes 'Eyewitness News' as an unique format. Unless someone can provide maybe some cited sources that would better describe what makes 'Eyewitness News' a format different from other local news programs, I guess I'd be inclined to consider this more a brand than anything else. Tmore3 03:58, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree; I can't think of any news programme in the world that doesn't use the format described in the article; nor can I find anything unique about it or the difference between other descibed formats, such as "Action News". I also don't necessarily see a correlation between the use of the moniker "Eyewitness News" and the Frank Gari music package. I also don't see how that list is very useful. Something needs to change, or the writers of the article need to tell me what I'm missing here. --Char645 (talk) 07:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't know where this was sourced, but it's all wrong in every respect. I know because I worked there and there are dozens of people who did too who can supply accurate information.Link2dan (talk) 14:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

At about five to nine this morning, I switched on CapeTalk …. having seen sky, heard VOA & BBC. Thought I was going to get ‘parliament on fire’ info from the coal face from the channel that was the closest of all to the incident. Pre-news banter….. News at nine. Lead story was what Ramaposa said yesterday at Tutu’s funeral! Even some mention of a recent fire in Colorado and a update on how things were going in Denver …. more banter till I could stomach it no longer ….. at about twenty five past nine I switched to BBC radio news to find out how things were going in Cape Town ! Absolutely no mention of a fire in Cape Town ! A news disservice 192.143.136.104 (talk) 13:20, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]