This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Finance & Investment High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm no expert in the fee industry, but I think that "convenience fee" probably deserves it own page. My reasoning is that these because-we-can fees have become so prevalent in the US, and across so many consumer-realm products, that the name 'convenience fee' is become cliche. It should be noted to people whom don't live inside the US and whom live in nations with stronger consumer regulations, convenience fees are extra costs that are incurred after a quote is performed to make a product or service appear cheaper until after a contract or agreement is completed. Convenience fees are justified to cover additional costs incurred to provide added-value service to the customer, but that in many occasions that logic is defied (such as a utility charging $3 dollars to pay a bill electronically over the phone in an automated system, as opposed to mailing a check for free, even though the manual teller processes cost more for the firm.) I believe that such a page can evolve to experience a healthy and organic growth in a relatively short period.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121008032841/http://www.ncsu.edu/project/calscommblogs/economic/archives/2007/05/the_difference.html to http://www.ncsu.edu/project/calscommblogs/economic/archives/2007/05/the_difference.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]