Orphaned references in FilmDistrict[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of FilmDistrict's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "bom":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 19:00, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Drive (2011) - Relationship between Universal and Film District[edit]

I just wanted to get or potentially correct some information regarding Drive. All sources on the Internet describe Drive as being distributed by FilmDistrict. However, after watching the movie, I noticed the big Universal logo as the first thing that comes up on the screen when the movie starts. What's Universal's relationship to Drive? Did they produce it or distribute it or did they help with distribution? --STrav1991 (talk) 20:11, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{ping|STrav1991)) It looks like Universal was just the distributor. This states, "A FilmDistrict release presented in association with Bold Films and OddLot Entertainment of a Marc Platt/Motel Movies production," with no mention of Universal. Erik (talk | contribs) 20:27, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]