GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Midnightblueowl (talk · contribs) 13:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Unless there are any objections, I'll field this one Josh. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for taking the time to look; I will reply to your comments soon. Josh Milburn (talk) 13:58, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Midnightblueowl: Thanks a lot; I think I've gotten to everything. Josh Milburn (talk) 15:25, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In general, very good. There is nothing here that I can see as an impediment to GA status. There are a few points perhaps worthy of a little discussion, however:

Great work, Josh. I'm happy to promote this one. Midnightblueowl (talk) 15:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]