This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business: Accounting This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Accounting task force.

I don't think RSI needs it's own article. There's just not enough for it to stand on its own. That information can easily be added into this one. Amalas =^_^= 15:54, 2 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're right, the RSI article can be deleted, I unlinked the two pages that referenced it. --Beefyt 21:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Previously, I added a link to my free accounting math book; however, that was in violation of the conflict of interest policy. So now I am proposing that someone else add the external link to the book. It has a section that mathemacically describes Governmental Accounting, which is appropriate for this article. The URL to the book is *Governmental Accounting Mathematically Described. Timhowardriley 17:06, 2 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Most of the material covered by this article is part of the Fund Accounting article. A separate article for Governmental Accounting seems redundant and unnecessary. Perhaps Governmental should be merged into Fund? Folklore1 (talk) 18:24, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As Governmental Accounting at the Federal level is not fund accounting, the articles should not be merged. FLAHAM (talk) 14:57, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fund accounting is merely one (antiquated) kind of governmental accounting and the two cannot be merged conceptually. The fact that too little material exists on the subject of governmental accounting is not a valid reason for merging. It merely indicates that the material should then be expanded.

Sources:

1. Sanderson, I. Worldwide Credit Crisis and Stimulus Packages, in Accountancy SA, June 2009, p.14.

2. Conradie, J.M. The applicability of Generally Accepted Accounting Practice in the Central Government of South Africa (English summary of a thesis written in another language) University of Pretoria, 1993.

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Required supplementary information. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 28#Required supplementary information until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What is government Accounting? Explain with its features. 103.181.226.54 (talk) 11:49, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]