Gwerz Skolan has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 14, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Gwerz Skolan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 April 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 13:29, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | Concise and clear prose, no issues with spelling or grammar. | Pass |
(b) (MoS) | The article is mostly complaint with the manual of style. | Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | The article may be missing some major aspects. (Resolved) | Pass |
(b) (focused) | The article remains on topic. | Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
No issues with the policy on neutral point of view were found. | Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
No edit warring, content disputes or major changes. | Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) | not applicable | Pass |
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) | not applicable | Pass |
The website from note 9, it was authoritative enough for me since it simply presented Skene in an easy, clickable format. I have, however, changed the reference to go to Skene directly.
Ha, your second point, I hope I represented them fairly, and I am going back to them again anyway (see below) and will double-check.
Kemener 2009, I changed the text a bit: "classic" was a bit of interpretation, and I changed it to stay closer to the text, giving a few details. But Kemener's expertise is real, and the French article does a better job of proving that: he's not just a singer, he's also a published ethnomusicologist, and I accept his expertise.
I separated the two references, but I want to point out that having two references in one note is pretty widely accepted. As for sfn, I do not use that myself, at all, but if you insist I will change it.
"in lines 184-189"--I've changed that bit around, and provided content/context.
Now, I find that my own content is a bit thin, and I'm going back to the well (especially Laurent) to write up a bit more, esp. about the different versions. I'll get on it, and I'll ping you soon when I feel more comfortable with that section. Thanks again! Drmies (talk) 18:11, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Drmies, I've read through the expansion and it looks alright. I'm passing it as it pretty much fulfills the criteria. The prose can be polished a bit though, I think there a couple minor issues in this regard.
Tayi Arajakate Talk 23:34, 14 May 2021 (UTC)