GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gwerz Skolan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 13:29, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

  1. Comprehension: The article is well written.
  2. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) Concise and clear prose, no issues with spelling or grammar. Pass Pass
    (b) (MoS) The article is mostly complaint with the manual of style. Pass Pass
  3. Verifiability: The article is verifiable.
  4. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) The article has a list of references. Pass Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) There are inline citations for the body but some sources may not be reliable. (Resolved) Pass Pass
    (c) (original research) No major issues with original research was found, excluding one. (Resolved) Pass Pass
    (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) No copyright issues found, the translation of the gwerz is from 1868. Pass Pass
  5. Comprehensiveness: The article is adequately comprehensive.
  6. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) The article may be missing some major aspects. (Resolved) Pass Pass
    (b) (focused) The article remains on topic. Pass Pass
  7. Neutrality: The article is neutral.
  8. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    No issues with the policy on neutral point of view were found. Pass Pass
  9. Stability: The article is stable.
  10. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    No edit warring, content disputes or major changes. Pass Pass
  11. Illustration: The article has adequate illustration.
  12. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) not applicable Pass Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) not applicable Pass Pass

Comments

Drmies, I've read through the expansion and it looks alright. I'm passing it as it pretty much fulfills the criteria. The prose can be polished a bit though, I think there a couple minor issues in this regard.

Tayi Arajakate Talk 23:34, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]