This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gynaecology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine: Reproductive Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force. Women's Health Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale. Sexology and sexuality High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/gynecology--71.205.113.109 (talk) 06:03, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's the US spelling. This page appears to use the UK/Commonwealth spelling. Oxford Dictionary --EarthSprite^∞ 19:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

what happen generally when uterus comes in the centre ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.204.161.183 (talk) 18:47, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Goralgandhi (talk) 04:59, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DannyS712 (talk) 05:18, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why doesn’t this article mention breast health as within the purview of gynecologists? It seems like an oversight. 2601:640:8980:B847:F842:D938:20DF:1C70 (talk) 20:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Small stub already covered more on target page section Therapies Iztwoz (talk) 18:55, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I feel it should be kept as separate article as the surgery article can be later expanded with content related to it. Thanks. Gardenkur (talk) 02:13, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In order to maintain simplicity and better understanding for readers in and out the field, I feel it should not be merged but can transited into through links that could be inserted into the parent article. Xingi06 (talk) 13:00, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There being no support for this proposal, I have removed the tags.

Gardenkur, Iztwoz's right about the surgery article being extremely short. Are you able to find a source or two and expand it at least a little? It should presumably mention common surgeries like hysterectomies as well as subspecialties like Oncogynecological surgery. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WhatamIdoing. Request you to give me some time for expanding it. Will surely do it as there are sufficient sources with substantial coverage. Thanks. Gardenkur (talk) 03:12, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:There is no deadline for this. I'm glad to hear that you'll look into it when you can. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:23, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The tone of this portion of the article seems oddly defensive of Sims, maybe not exactly correct for Wikipedia, with no citations.

“Sims developed his new specialty using the bodies of enslaved women, who could not refuse the extended glance of any white male that cared to observe any part of their anatomy. They could not "consent" in the sense modern medical research requires. No one did. Sims did not use anesthesia, for which he would be severely criticized 160 years later.

At the time anesthesia was itself a research area, and the first experiments (in dentistry) were being published. Using early anesthesia (in 1845, say) was much more dangerous and difficult than it would be a century later. In addition, it was widely believed that Blacks did not feel pain as much as whites, and white women proved unable to endure the pain.” 64.89.129.23 (talk) 04:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree that this section is indeed "off". I have removed one passage I considered both irrelevant and objectionable (the "No one did." of the second paragraph quoted above). There have been other edits, some of which have made the passage impenetrable. For example, the third paragraph above remains, though the sentence that precedes it, which mentions anaesthesia, has been moved forwards and refactored.. Personally, I think this whole section could be much shorter since Sims has his own page, linked to here. Krozruch (talk) 14:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]