This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Maritime / South Pacific This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force Australia: Sydney / Military history / Maritime Mid‑importance HMAS Kuttabul (naval base) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian maritime history (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Ed User:Adam.J.W.C. revertion to bad or own photography (WP:BOLD) Hpeterswald (talk) 19:26, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have any photos in this article. Also I notice that all the photos you are adding are poor quality hdr photos that have not been processed properly ***Adam*** (talk) 05:51, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also you need to stop adding weird comments to mutipletalk pages as this could be construed as being disruptive and could lead to a block from an admin ***Adam*** (talk) 05:54, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article seems to confuse Kuttabul with Fleet Base East, writing as if they were the same thing. Kuttabul is a part of Fleet Base East but it is not all of it. Fleet Base East includes the civilian-run Garden Island Dockyard, the naval wharves at Woolloomooloo and several other facilities. It is a 'grouping' of facilities and establishments, some military and some civilian, of which HMAS Kuttabul is only one. I have rewritten the introductory paragraph of this article to reflect this and I will rewrite the entire article in time. I think we need to create a separate 'Fleet Base East' page to explain what Fleet Base East is, its history, and to tie together the separate pages for HMAS Kuttabul, Garden Island Dockyard, HMAS Waterhen, etc. Stuart midgley (talk) 03:27, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And I have rewritten and added references to Fleet Base East to provide the bigger picture context. Rangasyd (talk) 08:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]