GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: RoySmith (talk · contribs) 02:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


I'm taking a look at this now. It looks like this is your first GA submission; thank you for putting in the effort to write this and submit it for review! RoySmith (talk) 02:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

History[edit]

Route[edit]

Artwork[edit]

Recognition[edit]

References[edit]

That's a good first pass. Work on those then ping me when you're done and I'll take another look. RoySmith (talk) 03:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmith Thank you for the review! I have edited the article to incorporate your feedback. Some notes about this round of changes:
  • I have de-linked Three Bridges Park for now. While I would like to create an article for it, I want to think for a while longer about whether it would be better to instead include information about it in the existing Menomonee Valley article.
  • To avoid the WP:SEAOFBLUE problem, I only wikilinked the in-line skating item. Walking, jogging, bicycling, and being disabled are common knowledge, but in-line skating is not necessarily common knowledge.
  • Unfortunately, it seems like Template:Maplink does not display markers when type=line. Since the trailheads are simply the easternmost and westernmost points of the trail, I instead opted for removing the coordinates from the Route section.
huntertur (talk) 05:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some additional comments:

@RoySmith Thank you for the additional pass. Your comments in this pass and the previous regarding the Artwork section have especially been helpful since I haven't attempted to write about artwork in an encyclopedic tone before. The WP:RS item is a good catch; upon searching for a better source, I learned that planning for the reroute actually started two years earlier. Please let me know if any other items could use improvement. huntertur (talk) 04:14, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, this look good, I'll mark this as passed in a few minutes. I would encourage you to keep working on the map. I think a map showing not just the route but all the various points of interest would add to the article, but I can't justify holding up the GA approval for that. I'm pretty sure ((maplink)) is capable of doing all that, even if it's not immediately obvious how it works. As I noted above, the folks at WP:WikiProject Maps are usually happy to lend technical assistance. RoySmith (talk) 15:59, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.