This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Hinduism: Shaivism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Shaivism task force (assessed as High-importance).

I've been a bit on the bold side with recent edits, but the page needed it. Going ahead I feel more arguments are needed as detailed sub-sections under the 'Different concepts' section (in order to create more of a balance to the page). Also it would be nice to have information specifically on Harihara, not concerning the debate on Vishnu & Shiva. Ys, GourangaUK 14:48, 20 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Harihara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071009160352/http://srimadbhagavatam.com/12/13/16/en1 to http://srimadbhagavatam.com/12/13/16/en1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716171647/http://www.swaminarayansatsang.com/library/scriptures/index.asp?idCategory=2&curPage=2&MediaType= to http://www.swaminarayansatsang.com/library/scriptures/index.asp?idCategory=2&curPage=2&MediaType=

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:09, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]