This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Weak oppose. For context, the other topic with this name is JP Sears (baseball). Monthly average pageviews for the two articles (starting with the athlete's MLB debut in April 2022) can be found here, and show the comedian receiving a little over three times the average views of the baseball player. This may be partially buttressed by his holding the primary title, but outgoing pageviews show that only 15% of people (as of the most recent data) travel from the comedian's article directly to the baseball player's article. This suggests there's not a terribly large portion of readers being confused by the current setup. The evidence seems to narrowly support the comedian being the PRIMARYTOPIC, but it's definitely a close call. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 16:46, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment nominating editor is a paid editor as disclosed on his talk page. I am also Weak oppose per comments by ModernDayTrilobite above. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 19:29, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment my most recent paid edit was March 2017; this is irrelevant to this move nomination. Joeykai (talk) 21:50, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This recent Vice source has good depth and goes into anti-trans content that is more recent. An interesting comment is that what we often refer to as WP:FRINGE is now going mainstream 'As the line between the fringe and the mainstream blurs, conspiracy peddlers are influencing—and in turn being influenced by—the national panic targeting trans people." Jtbobwaysf (talk) 09:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This needs discussion. I raised the question of reliability of vice.com at the RSN but there's genuinely no consensus. The version we have as of today is totally unacceptable as it misrepresents the source. Can we agree (1) whether this comedian's videos are sufficiently relevant to include, and (2) how we deal with Merlan's negative viewpoint if some editors feel she is biased? Elemimele (talk) 07:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I don't think anyone is questioning that Sears mocked trans people. His videos are self-evident of this. The questions seems to be whether this is relevant to a disinterested article about the subject and if Vice is good enough to include contentious material in a WP:BLP. The section is about his post-2020 comedy, and one could argue that mocking transgender people as part of his comedy is relevant information (would a reporter have written extensively about it if it wasn't?). But I can see an argument for not including, too. Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 14:31, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think there's a reasonable case for including the fact he mocked trans people, but if we use Merlan's Vice.com piece to do it, we must quote her accurately. But there is a clear consensus to avoid Merlan's extremely negative language. Therefore the best option is not to include it at all unless someone can find others sharing Merlan's view. There is also an argument for not including this: that Sears has mocked so many different groups and lifestyles over recent years that mocking trans people doesn't stand out as particularly significant. Basically, it's just part of what he does. Elemimele (talk) 15:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
My point was that the trans mocking, if there is such a term, is now more mainstream. Might want to include that part as well. I am not opposed to inclusion of the trans mocking. The comedian mocks all kinds of people, so I dont any issue with it. I think mocking is in fact his career. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 00:46, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Im opposed to including this material. Pyrrho summed it up perfectly: The questions seems to be whether this is relevant to a disinterested article about the subject and if Vice is good enough to include contentious material in a WP:BLP. My opinion is no on both counts. I think the mere fact that someone somewhere criticized this guy is not relevant in and of itself. I think the fact that Vice is a pretty questionable source underscores that point. This is not the sort of criticism that is terribly relevant because if it were, it would likely appear in more than one source or a better source or elicit some response from this guy. People like this exist to gin up controversy, i dont think there is much value in listing out each time he provokes a response. Bonewah (talk) 19:04, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
