This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animation Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Japan: Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 15:26, April 26, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the joint Japanese cinema task force. WikiProject Japan to do list: edit history watch purge Peer review: Kako River (Japan) A-class review: None Featured content candidates –  Articles: None Pictures: None Lists: None Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One Add requested images to articles that need them. Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions. Improve and expand Japan-related stubs. Create some requested articles. Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English. Assess unassessed articles Film: Filmmaking / Japanese This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force. This article is supported by the Japanese cinema task force.

If this does not meet the notability guidlines, then we can delete the Disney article as well. This notability nonsense should be removed from the article, it is like requiring notability to be established for the Disney article, for example. This company may not be as old or as big as Disney, but their productions are of as high a quality and as loved as those of Disney, if not more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.124.144.66 (talk) 17:31, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Though I disagree with the above statement and it goes without saying that Jetlag's animated films are neither as well known or appreciated nor of as high quality as Disney's, the subject is notable enough even if considerably more obscure. Few would consider Wikipedia as the primary source for articles relating to the Walt Disney Company, while the scare availability of information related to Jetlag Productions would make the Wikipedia article more valuable than one for Disney, which has plenty of more reliable sources than Wikipedia. T.W. (talk) 18:26, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]