This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Women artists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted on 29 December 2021 by reviewer Robert McClenon (talk · contribs). Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group. Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Reviewer Note

The subject appears to be notable. It is the work of a paid editor, and it is not obviously the work of a paid editor. I am accepting it, but am tagging it as containing paid contributions so that another editor will review it. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert McClenon I don't see any significant coverage in independent sources. amandapalmer.bandcamp.com/? raftalondonstory is a blog, temporary-culture is her publisher, salonfutura is a blog, thames-sidestudios is an online store, nybooks.com looked promising, but only uses her work as an illustration and walks.com has "Guided by Judith". How does any of this establish that the subject s notable? Vexations (talk) 22:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vexations - It appears that I was being sloppy in my reviewing, in that I wasn't looking for third-party coverage. I think that the subject is notable, but that this article doesn't establish her notability. So if you propose it for deletion, I will not remove the PROD tag, and the originator should not remove the tag, but should instead try to improve the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I am IndigoFrog - the person who drafted the article. I see you said above that the 'orginator' should try to improve the article. Is that referring to me? If so, what kind of content in particular would improve the article?

Hello Vexations and Robert McClenon. This is IndigoFrog. I got mixed up and made a mistake when submitting the article. I was not paid for the creation of this article. As a result, is it possible to get the paid contributor tag removed?