This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Toys Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Toys To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More... Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles. Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles. Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the ((WikiProject Toys)) banner. Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention Aviation This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: criterion met

Should the content of this page be moved onto the power kite page? I cannot really see why the two are separate. I also wonder whether the kite related pages about LEI's, foil kites etc. should be integrated into this one. If it's too vast, a single page is clearly not good. But if things are spread out too much, the reader will have a hard time trying to stay focussed. Opinions?

misterb, 29 Sept 2005

I agree. It seems counter intuitive to have to follow links to all these seperate pages. The casual reader will be looking for a concise overview on Power Kites - as was I on first visit. The subject is hardly extensive at present (well at least the basics) - so surely a single page would suffice and provide a good overview.

my vote is for this separate kite control page to continue, as many non-power control applications are covered. dave santos 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.118.1.77 (talk) 17:05, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My vote is that the two pages should be merged. JacobLynnFlemming (talk) 13:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kite control systems. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080404015238/http://www.georgespratt.org/ to http://www.georgespratt.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:45, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]