This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kodi (software) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 1 year

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Media Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Media To-do List: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Mackay Radio Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite NPOV : Content (media and publishing) Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper Other : Answer requests for comments Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Kodi (software) has been linked from multiple high-traffic websites. All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history. Table 18 September 2008 Slashdot link Traffic 28 December 2008 Slashdot link Traffic 28 May 2010 Slashdot link Traffic

Why the logo was replaced to a PNG with the name under the logo? I found there are plenty of variations on Commons:

• File:Kodi-top-bottom.svg, same as the current, just as a vector image;
• File:Kodi-side-by-side.svg, with the text next to the logo

There are also logos of XBMC. I think it should be displayed here. Here's a vector version, File:XBMC Logo.svg. Taken from the categories, commons:Category:Kodi and commons:Category:XBMC Media Center. Galzigler (talk) 22:52, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is the objection to discussing the discontinuation of Python 2 support, which kills many plugins?

Kodi 19, "Matrix", discontinued support for the outdated Python 2 scripting language, moving to Python 3; this had the side-effect of making add-ons dependent upon Python 2 incompatible. Most unauthorized add-ons became unusable unless they were updated.^[1]

Best wishes, Pol098 (talk) 19:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Python 2 was superseded more than a decade ago, and had been on bug-fix only support for the last several years. It's officially dead now; it is not surprising that Kodi does not support a level of Python that is not supported.

If it must be mentioned, which I think is unnecessary, I can see replacing "Python" with "Python 3" in the section on Python scripts. It's absolutely not lede-worthy. In an article the size of this one, the detail of an obsolete level software being treated as obsolete does not ride to the level of being covered in the lede.

The proposed text indicated a specific Python level, 3.6, that is not supported by the source (which source, by the way, is not independent of the subject; not that big a deal for a matter like this, but an independent source, if one exists, would be preferred), so that level of unsupported specificity should not be there at all.

So, if anyone else agrees with you I won't object to adding the digit "3" in the appropriate portion of the body. TJRC (talk) 20:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've watched the back-and forth, and think I cleaned-up the initial edit, but do agree, it's not necessary in the lede. Moreover, it's classic WP:RECENTISM, and when I saw it I also thought that it should be excluded per WP:NOTNEWS, but there is already a lot of that sort of thing here so did not bother. I have no problems with excluding it though. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The reason that I think this is notable (which I still do) is that the actual effect of discontinuing support for Python 2 is that most of the huge number of unauthorised add-ons which have been the cause of contention are disabled at one fell swoop, a "side-effect" which is likely to be desired. Stopping Python 2 support is, in itself, not notable, I quite agree. Pol098 (talk) 14:03, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Show reliable sources that support your claim. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:32, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]