This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I think the remaining "issues" tags could now be removed but I will leave this decision to others. Biscuittin (talk) 08:31, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Should this ITU document be interpreted like "ITU allowed telecommunication companies to name their service 'LTE-A' even though all they have just started is Carrier Aggregation (phase 1 of LTE-A)"?
If it should, I'd like to rename this article '3GPP release 10', and make 'LTE Advanced' a disambiguation page. But because I'm not a telecommunication expert, I need your help. JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 01:17, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Well, I'm asking because SK Telecom and LG U+ is advertising their service as LTE-A when actually all they have just started is Carrier Aggregation, not the full LTE Advanced. Some say ITU are allowing telecom companies to do so, but I'm not sure. JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 07:43, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
The technology demonstrations are fun, but there are so damn many on this page that they're distracting. I think they should go in a separate page. Comments? Sanpitch (talk) 21:18, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Good luck in finding someone else for a vote. I'm not sure if I agree with you. MrCellular (talk) 22:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |