This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Languages This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Africa: Ghana Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Ghana (assessed as Top-importance).

This article is written in Ghanaian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, realise, analyse, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Certainly, the title does not seem appriopriate at all.

I think the title should be "Government-sponsored languages". "languages of ghana" is such a broad heading that does not fit with the number of languages discussed on this article. Let me also state that including unsources material in this artcle only demotes and drives down its quality, as such reckless contributions like adding unverified statments as well as swift deletions with no prior notice of a ^{[citation needed]} is not a good practice.

A few quick ideas:

• Should this section be renamed somehow? Is this the operant term? I ask as in some countries it is more a matter of legal status (e.g., as "national languages") or government recognition. Sponsorship almost implies a kind of active support and cultivation - if this is what is meant then fine.
• Another possible title, if needed, could be something like:
  • "Government recognized languages"
  • "National languages"
  • Or some configuration that discusses languages under different categories of government/official recognition/support and initiatives by educational authorities, research institutions and NGOs
• Another heading that might be useful is "Language policy and planning." This could either stand alone or have the "Government sponsored..." and "Education..." headings muved under it as subheadings. Or something ... but language policy/planning is an essential topic
• Another heading (and eventually a separate page?) should be Bureau of Ghana Languages

I'm pretty certain that government-sponsored is the term used in Ghana, hence its use here. I think the idea is that the government is prepared to put some money towards them, via the Bureau, but they are certainly not national or even official languages in the way that those terms are normally used. But I'm prepared to be corrected! If you think other sections should be added, please go ahead and do it. I wrote to the limits of my knowledge. Gailtb 04:21, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would be useful to relate this "government-sponsored languages" category to the "national language" designation (mentioned above) which is used in a number of other countries in Africa. This in turn could go to improve the article on national languages, which needs some work. --A12n 03:44, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the initial paragraph to lead off with three key facts: the country is multilingual, the official language is English (this was previously the lead), and the most widely spoken language is Akan. I believe this gives readers a more helpful initial picture. This also involved splitting the original paragraph into two.--A12n (talk) 18:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@A12n: Thanks for passing by. The sentence reads good and looks nice now. Best. →Enock4seth ^(talk) 20:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome and thank you for the feedback. Will try to review other articles in this (these) categories and return to this one.--A12n (talk) 17:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Languages of Ghana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140407085659/http://www.ling.hf.ntnu.no/tross/osam.pdf to http://www.ling.hf.ntnu.no/tross/osam.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120828183503/http://www.ethnologue.com/show_country.asp?name=Ghana to http://www.ethnologue.com/show_country.asp?name=Ghana

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:29, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 213.204.87.33 (talk) 15:18, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]