Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 16:20, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Intro: "who seem to be hiding" -> "both of whom seem to be hiding"  Done
• Intro: You don't need to link United States, per Overlink  Done - one links to Television in the United States, one just links to the country.
• Intro: Maybe organize the last paragraph a bit better so that the Nielsen ratings and the sentence about the lower ratings are next to each other. Not a biggie. Not done - Would have to change all BOP articles to fit this, and in a previous review, I got told "Critics, then ratings".
• Plot: Why is there a reference for the first sentence? I'd just put all of them at the end of the entire section  Done
• Plot: "Brian is repeating this with Nina" Maybe something like "Brian has started to abuse Nina, however." just to make it clearer  Done
• Plot: You don't need to cite the episode with the episode. It's assumed that, since this is a page on the episode, the episode will automatically be used as a reference  Not done - In all BOP articles, just a back up on DYK reviews and FAC reviews.
• Production: "best known for directing" -> "best known for directing episodes of"  Done
• Production: Just a personal preference, but I think 'season 1' looks better as either "season one" or "the first season". Same with 'season 2' -  Not done In all BOP articles, and page name.
• Reception: "Among viewers between ages 18 and 49, it received a 2.0 rating/9 share; a share represents the percentage of households using a television at the time the program is airing." -> "Among viewers between ages 18 and 49, it received a 2.0 rating/9 share. This means that it was seen by 2 percent of all 18- to 49-year-olds, and 9 percent of all 18- to 49-year-olds watching television at the time of the broadcast."  Done
• Reception: Why does a statement from Christine Orlando of TV Fanatic end in a question mark?  Done
• Reception: "She praised the interaction between the Megan" Kill 'the'  Done
• Reception: "She finished, ""Letting Go" definitely" -> "She finished, "'Letting Go' definitely" (single quotes)  Done
• References: add writer and director for Ref 2 and 6 -  Not done - Ref 2 is the article now - in the infobox, ref 6 is linked to the article. No need.
• References: Use consistent dating methods (either Day Month, Year; Month Day, Year; etc)  Done

Otherwise, a good article. On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC) - Thanks for the review, very thorough! :) — M.Mario (T/C) 13:42, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) No, American should still be unlinked as per WP:OVERLINK guidelines. Even if its to Television in the United States. TBrandley 16:00, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One is linked to "America and one is linked to Television in the United States. WP:OVERLINK does not work, if there are same words, linked to seperate articles. — M.Mario (T/C) 16:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The link to America should be unlinked because per WP:OVERLINK you should Avoid linking the names of major geographic features and locations, languages, religions, and common professions.; this includes countries. Also, television in the US should be because it is a common term, and it does not enhance the reader's comprehensiveness. WP:OVERLINK does not just refer to the repeated linking of terms, but also the linking of general terms. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 16:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the review by TBrandley here, it says "Link American to Television in the United States", so is this wrong? — M.Mario (T/C) 16:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TBrandley continues to learn, and was probably not aware of the overlinking when doing that review. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I was not blaming him, but just wanted justification. — M.Mario (T/C) 16:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. At that time, I thought United States is overlink, and TV in US wasn't. TV in US is a common term. TBrandley 16:56, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This all looks good now. I will pass it. Congrats!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:34, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]