This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Fictional characters This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

The character development of Fred Yokas vis-a-vis reversing gender roles reads as original research. Having said that, I agree with it - but that's neither here nor there. It does seem like (an informed) opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.66.123.124 (talk) 13:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There should probably be entries added for the hospital/ER staff. They are in most episodes and contribute to the character plots in various degrees. Heinrich krebs (talk) 00:27, 8 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The wording regarding Cruz's rape is not only highly offensive, but contrary to the theme of the subsequent episodes. Her commitment to the job lead to her being raped? So she had a choice, she knew it would happen? For like 2 episodes she wouldn't even use it for her job, even though it would make arresting him alot easier. The wording is also grade school "this is shown by this" followed by another sentence with the same structure. Deleting it, if someone wants to put the rape stuff back, put it back in a way that makes sense. 108.161.117.228 (talk) 01:27, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]