Babs and Buster Bunny was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 25 November 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of Tiny Toon Adventures characters. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Montana Max was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 11 November 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of Tiny Toon Adventures characters. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Nickelodeon List‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles List This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.  Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Nickelodeon task force (assessed as Low-importance). Animation: American / Television / Warner Bros. / Looney Tunes List‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles List This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.  Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Warner Bros. Animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Looney Tunes work group (assessed as Mid-importance). Fictional characters List‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles List This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Lists List‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles List This article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale.  Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Animation / Television List‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Unreferenced BLPs Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles List This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.  Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Furrball was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 24 January 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of Tiny Toon Adventures characters. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Gogo Dodo was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 3 November 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of Tiny Toon Adventures characters. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

The image File:Fifi.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

• File:Plucky Duck.jpg
• File:Model monty color.jpg
• File:Model gogo color.jpg
• File:Model elmyra color.jpg
• File:Model buster color.jpg
• File:Model babs color.jpg
• File:Hamton.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --14:22, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Never heard that one before, and (even though it's been a while since I've seen the show) I can't recall anything remotely hinting at that being true. WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 18:54, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think the articles to these characters need to be merged into this article with a list of characters, since some cartoons, games, books, movies, and etc,. are having their very own Wikis, which have articles of each character, plus the Tiny Toon Adventures cartoon show is quite short that the characters who are almost exclusive to this show are not enough to have their own articles here on Wikipedia that has quite a lot of articles on random things. --PJ Pete 17:29, March 17, 2010. (UTC)

Isn't Mary Melodie based on Coal black and the sebben dwarfs character. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.96.119.75 (talk) 03:47, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm fairly sure that Shirley calls herself a loon because she's a loon, no? Serendi^podous 20:02, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm just wondering if it is necessary to add the ages of all the characters and, if so, could it be better incorporated into the article? ItsZippy (talk) 22:02, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Where's Babs? She's mentioned in Buster's section, but has no section of her own. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.176.9.254 (talk) 17:11, 17 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

While some Tiny Toon Adventures characters are sufficiently independently notable to justify their own articles, Fifi La Fume is not. As such, the Fifi La Fume article should be merged here. Neelix (talk) 02:38, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What? I'm sorry, I just don't see it. Nor was there a discussion on her own article, and no one supported your decision here yet either. Strong Oppose.--SexyKick 23:57, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

5 days is the standard time to wait for opposition on a proposed merger, and the merger target talk page is the accepted location for merger discussions. I also placed tags on both of the articles themselves. Why do you oppose the merger? Neelix (talk) 00:59, 1 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fifi La Fume is one of the most popular characters in the series. If I hadn't been so busy this week, I would have noticed the merger notice and posted here. I would have also noticed regardless if it had been brought up in the articles talk page, since most people who would have something to say about this don't even watch this page. Coming to this list and going through it, I also notice Dizzy Devil's article was deleted after two discussions that resulted in keep, that's not right. If Gogo Dodo deserves his own article, Fifi La Fume surely easily qualifies for her own article as well. Moreover, deleting the other page is not the same thing as merging their page into this page.--SexyKick 01:32, 1 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I also oppose this merger for the same reasons as SexyKick. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.228.78.72 (talk) 19:12, 1 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As far as I can tell, the only reason SexyKick has brought up against the merger is that Fifi La Fume is a popular character. Popularity is not the criterion by which it is determined whether a subject should have its own article on Wikipedia; notability is that criterion, and notability is proven by producing citations that indicate significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources, per Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Fifi La Fume has no such coverage, therefore this character should not have an independent article. Neelix (talk) 03:54, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pretty much all the toons have the same amount of references. Her article is longer than most of the characters as well. Buster and Babs bunny have only one citation. Are they not notable enough? Fifi La Fumes article could easily be expanded, as there are multiple sources that cover a wider range than what is written in her already long (for a Tiny Toons character) article.--SexyKick 04:02, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notability is not determined by the number of sources currently on an article but rather the number of sources that exist regarding the subject of the article. As far as I can tell, the search you provide does not demonstrate a sufficient amount of reliable coverage of Fifi La Fume. Unless reliable sources are added to the article, it should be merged here. Neelix (talk) 01:42, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, first of all, there is no consensus for the merger yet. Second of all, those are reliable sources that mention Fifi La Fume in different contexts. The number of sources exist for Fifi La Fume. They shouldn't have to be added to the article (at least not right now, just because of this discussion), or else Buster and Babs Bunny, which only has that same, single source in the article right now, would have to be moved here as well; it's the exact same story over there. I see where you're coming from, but if the sources exist, they exist. I don't want to have to go to work on an article just because it should be worked on better to be sufficient in one admin's eyes.--SexyKick 02:10, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

While the sources do not need to be added to the Fifi La Fume article in order to demonstrate the subject's notability, the sources do need to be identified if the article is to be maintained separate from this list. After having searched, I do not believe a sufficient amount of coverage of this character exists in the secondary literature, but if you believe otherwise, you are welcome to identify the relevant sources. If sources do not surface, the merger should go ahead. Neelix (talk) 00:14, 7 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Damn it, did the merger go through? You should merge all of the other characters, then, seeing as most are also not notable enough! Also, nobody supported the merger, so why did it go through? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.228.78.72 (talk) 09:45, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Twice now, I have suggested this merger and waited five days without anyone responding to my comments, and twice I have merged the article. No one has demonstrated that this character has a sufficient amount of coverage in reliable, secondary sources to justify its own article. If you believe that the other character articles should be moved here, or that new information has arisen that suggests that this article should be re-split-off, start a new discussion, but do not simply revert the merger. This conversation has already concluded twice according to standard procedure. Neelix (talk) 12:07, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: Consensus is not overruled by linking to pages in the Wikipedia namespace. Almafeta (talk) 10:00, 5 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Twice now nothing. I and this IP user both objected to this move. There is/was/never any consensus to push the move through. I even brought up a list of other sources which you choose to ignore. It was a google book search for Fifi La Fume, those sources that mention her then are reliable secondary sources.--SexyKick 18:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And he doesn't realize (Or just doesn't care about) the consequences the merger will have. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.228.78.72 (talk) 20:27, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Consequences? He's an admin and knows what he's doing...the consequences are only that Fifi La Fume is less notable in Wikipedias view and has less information readily available on the internet.--SexyKick 22:44, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Which can potentially be a major problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.228.78.72 (talk) 23:03, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Neelix, I have restored the Fifi article, as we've waited three weeks and no one has come to agree with you, but unfortunately neither has anyone come to agree with us. 2-1 isn't a consensus for the 1.--SexyKick 23:58, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Further more, Fictional Skunks:, Reading the Rabbit, Tiny Toons Characters, and Fictional French People are just four sources I find effortlessly. I expect if Fifi La Fume is somehow not notable enough, then truly no Tiny Toons Character is notable enough considering the severe lack of sources for Buster and Babs Bunny. One citation is in their article. It's ridiculous to find Fifi La Fume, one of the more notable and popular characters in the show, with more than one readily available citation, not notable enough.--SexyKick 22:38, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

By the way, something is wrong with the image on the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.228.78.72 (talk) 09:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It was deleted because it was a non free image not in an article. I'll upload an image and put it there soon.--SexyKick 12:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I wanna know some other episodes that Patmay K. Pig appeared, otherwise "Buster and Babs Go Hawaiian". Do one of you users know?

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Tiny Toon Adventures characters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141128233936/http://webbut.unitbv.ro/Bulletin/Series%20IV/OLD%20Folder/BULETIN%20IV/g_10_Xavier%20Fuster.pdf to http://webbut.unitbv.ro/Bulletin/Series%20IV/OLD%20Folder/BULETIN%20IV/g_10_Xavier%20Fuster.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:55, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jeff Bergman was never credited as a Road Runner in Tiny Toon Adventures Looney Jack 3.0 (talk) 12:49, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tiny Toons Looniversity is going to be a complete TV show reboot. Animaniacs (2020), while considering a reboot, is a revival/remake series due to its tie with the source. The characters and their roles in Tiny Toons Looniversity may be portrayed differently.