A fact from Lockheed J37 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 February 2008, and was viewed approximately 2,811 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the USA's first locally designed jet engine, the Lockheed J37, spent ten years in development but was never used on a production aircraft? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/February.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Engines This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

There is a discrepancy with the value given for thrust of 5,100 lbf (2,315 N). 5,100lbf actually equals 22700N, while 2315N equals 520lbf. 5,100lb equals 2313kg - perhaps this is where the error lies? Given the thrust range of comparable engines from the period, I'd suspect 5,100lbf is the correct thrust, and I have amended the article accordingly. If someone could provide a sourced answer to this question though, that would be useful. --Nick Moss (talk) 12:07, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why was it felt that the engine's efficiency had to be comparable to a piston-engine? I don't think any turbojet engine of that era could come even close at low altitudes (If they even can now). AVKent882 (talk) 02:56, 29 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You'd probably have to ask the designers or engineers of the project, but I doubt one of them is on WP, even if any are still alive. - BilCat (talk) 06:44, 29 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I could have told you that. I was wondering if anybody that is currently alive would have known this? AVKent882 (talk) 04:46, 3 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yet you still ask, expecting one of them to answer you! - BilCat (talk) 05:05, 3 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]