This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Virginia High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: U.S. counties Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. counties.

Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.

Gordonsville, Virginia says that town is in Orange County, Virginia. -- Beland 16:13, 3 January 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

About 2/3 of the history section is taken from http://louisatown.org/co-hist.htm, and the remainder is adapted (no longer matches the source), and either requires a reliable source, or should be removed. Tedickey (talk) 21:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do you have some reason to doubt the official history as authoritative? --Zeamays (talk) 22:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your edits diverge from the statements in the url, which is (read it) an extract from another work. The "official" (sic) history for example doesn't refer to a secular commune. Tedickey (talk) 23:31, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A very quick/partial list of items from the history section not corresponding to the given source:

• use of "secular" for commune (not found in source).
• unqualified use of "oldest" (source qualifies it by saying "still in existence")
• sentence referring to "retirees" (no part of that appears in source)
• contextually puzzling comment about Lake Anna (source does refer to it as a side effect of building the power station, what's left out of both is that its primary purpose is cooling the station - linked topic does that). In the current context, it makes Dominion sound as if it developed the lake for your entertainment.
• rewrite of the paragraph regarding Trevilians states that there were "several significant cavalry actions" (not found in source)
• comment about Thomas Johnson (not found in source)
• Louisa vs Louise (text and source differ)
• comment about when Patrick Henry lived there does not agree with source

Tedickey (talk) 22:11, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Louisa County, Virginia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore)) after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot)) to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130508062359/http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/se082311a.html to http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/se082311a.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:19, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Louisa County, Virginia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/60AH8ErZX?url=http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/51/51109.html to http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/51/51109.html
• Added archive https://archive.is/20160708144914/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/counties/totals/2015/CO-EST2015-alldata.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/counties/totals/2015/CO-EST2015-alldata.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Louisa County, Virginia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080511212328/http://louisatown.org/co-hist.htm to http://louisatown.org/co-hist.htm
• Added ((dead link)) tag to http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_EAST_COAST_QUAKE?SITE=INEVA&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
• Added ((dead link)) tag to http://www.vancouversun.com/news/thewest/quake+hits+East+Coast+felt+Toronto/5295200/story.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:20, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]