Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article contains a lot of unaddressed citation needed tags, thus failing criterion 1b. I will wait a week before closing this reassessment so editors can have the opportunity to fix these issues.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 03:36, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi FutureTrillionaire, I haven't reviewed your recent contributions in any great detail, but it seem--from the couple of GARs that I have seen--that you are applying standard in a GAR that are contrary to the GA requirements. WP:GA? requires only that a GA "provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines". It does not require inline citations for every fact in the article. For articles like Mali and Laura Robson, where the article has dozens of inline citations, but only a few non-contentious statements are missing inline citations, this is not a basis for a GAR. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:59, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Result: Delisted. It's been a week. The article's problems have not been completely fixed.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 01:19, 15 July 2013 (UTC)