This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit High‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Stations. This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit (assessed as Top-importance).

all i want to know is hen the metro station was built and why and what was there before i need it for a school coarsework.......please help

If you could phrase your question correctly, then maybe we can help. If not, then your coursework has far more problems than knowing when "the metro station" was built. --Golbez 18:52, 26 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Metro Station is a redirect to Metro Station (band). It looks like the band article should be moved as the disambiguation isn't necessary, or the redirect should be changed to link to Metro station. Discussion is at Talk:Metro Station (band)#Requested move. snigbrook (talk) 22:43, 3 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

23 pictures for a couple of paragraphs is extremely unnecessary. There are only so many times you can show a metro station, even if you are showing unique things.--Crossmr (talk) 14:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Agreed. Gallery trimmed, and pictures shuffled, and the article looks a lot more elegant now. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:45, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

100x better. I know people like to take pictures and all but we need to be reasonable with them.--Crossmr (talk) 00:16, 1 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Metro station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080307170412/http://www.ratp.fr/common/ressources/concertation_p1.pdf to http://www.ratp.fr/common/ressources/concertation_p1.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In Budapest, there is a metro station called Astoria that is interesting for its construction. I have no source to prove this information, but this station seems to be a combination of pylon and deep-column stations. I think it would be a good example for construction types as a combination of two of them. CERBERUS - ii iv iii (talk) 20:16, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is the NYC 168th Street Station for the 1 train not the first single vault station. Built in 1906. This page says the first station was built in 1975. 100.12.65.90 (talk) 21:46, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]