![]() | This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 27 November 2007. The result of the discussion was No consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current content needs to be deleted, and an actual biography inserted. BigK HeX (talk) 14:49, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Since the article now seems ok, in my eyes, I took away all the xxx, that said it was biased, perhaps should be rewritten and so on. It is too short, but that´s another thing. --Mats33 (talk) 22:49, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
While patrolling recent changes, I saw this edit made by 77.96.230.11 adding a description of the author's novels as "laying out the tenets of neo-antisemitism". After looking into the matter, I saw that the sources did not mention "neo-antisemitism" what-so-ever, felt that this was an edit that was not neutral and also violated WP:BLP (the need to remove such material is mandatory), and reverted the changes. The user keeps restoring the changes, has not offered any explanation as to why the information is not in violation and should be kept, and has instead only responded with this calling my warnings "lies" and claiming that this description is "common sense" even though no additional references were added to the article at all. I believe that this description implies a non-neutral viewpoint, is in complete violation of Wikipedia's BLP policy, and should be removed. The user has offered no reasonable explanation supporting their changes.
Reaching out to the user: Please explain here why your edit does not violate these policies, and please explain why it should be kept on the article. I agree that edit warring is absolutely NOT the right solution; I want to reach out and do the right thing so that we can discuss it. I will await your response. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I think that the following mention is an interesting information to add on the article page. What do you think?
For your information, also see Talk:Positive Money.
Adèle Fisher (talk) 20:38, 1 March 2018 (UTC).