This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mondelez International article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "Important". |
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
The name of the company is often styled "Mondelēz". The "e" with something above is a letter unique for the Latvian language. As far as I know it has no real function in this name. It is only seen in the logotype and should not be there in "normal" script. The company has no Latvian connection and even in that country it is written without it in normal text. Can anyone explain where it comes from? I have not found any information about that. --Andhanq (talk) 10:19, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
I have a removed an uncited and unverifiable claim about a merger from this article, Keurig Dr Pepper, Jacobs Douwe Egberts, and Peet's Coffee. Another similar edit by the same user on Kraft Heinz has already been reverted for the same reason. Feel free to restore if you can find a reputable source. DDFoster96 (talk) 12:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Kevdev1 (talk) 16:47, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Reading the history section, I was up to the year 1930, when National Dairy retained their name. I thought the next thing I was going to read would be information about the name change to Kraft. Instead, it goes directly into the year 2009, almost 80 years later. I understand that the details I was expecting are probably in the article on Kraft. However, I feel that there should be a brief, selected history here as well, that at least touches on the relevant chronological developments. Worldbook1967 (talk) 23:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
The traffic accident mentioned in the article under "Business with Russia" was introduced in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mondelez_International&diff=1092562438&oldid=1091529881 is irrelevant to the subsection. Mako001 reverted an edit subsectioning this as "Other controversies" citing [sic]"Hardly a controversy". The author of the edit previously named the section "Other criticism", so maybe we use that? 27.75.91.230 (talk) 20:27, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
You are showing a TV Commercial which is not true. Santa is not a black guy! Redo the TV Commercial with the true story, Santa is a white guy 216.189.165.66 (talk) 19:57, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Disregard this post - I see a similar previous post was answered some time ago.
Kevdev1 (talk) 01:34, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
References
@Kind Tennis Fan: Why is this section's neutrality being disputed? Jarble (talk) 01:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
It further states that the template can be removed if there's no discussion of it on the talk page. Accordingly, I have removed it. Fabrickator (talk) 02:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)the tag should only be used if there is a real concern that the criticism section and its contents are causing trouble with the article's neutrality.