This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

France High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Former countries: Holy Roman Empire / Prussia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles This article is supported by the Holy Roman Empire task force. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Prussia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

On 13 June 2014, it was proposed that this article be moved from Moselle to Moselle (departmart). The result of the discussion was moved.

Wondering how to edit this département entry? The Wikipedia:WikiProject French departements standards might help.

I'm coming across the Dukes of Moselle in the early genealogies of Charlemagne. Can anyone enlighten me as to their origins? Proberton (talk) 14:20, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Moselle (river) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:15, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Moselle (department). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061201123603/http://plattweb.free.fr/ to http://plattweb.free.fr/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:29, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that the Lachambre article should be to this article. Besides the fact that it's one of Moselle's departments. 4lepheus B4ron (talk) 13:51, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose; occupied places are usually notable, and it unclear why the case is being made for this one and not the 725 others listed in Category:Communes of Moselle (department). Klbrain (talk) 13:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closing, given the uncontested objection and no support, with stale discussion. Klbrain (talk) 12:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]