GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 00:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Interesting little article. Placing on hold until issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 00:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! About half of this article was written by a banned user, and we prefer different citation styles. That's the root cause of the inconsistency.
I'll get started on these today, but some (like the page number) might take me a day or two to dig up. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:27, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, that's understandable. Oh and don't let searching for the page number hold you up, I'll be happy to pass this with just the other issues addressed and you can add that later in your own time if you like. :) Freikorp (talk) 13:45, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Freikorp: - All the citations are now in templates, so that should fix the consistency issues. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:20, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Looks much better. Happy to pass now. :) Freikorp (talk) 14:29, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]