This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||
|
The contents of the Neo-Keynesian economics page were merged into Neoclassical synthesis on 11 May 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
|
|
This article has been found to be edited by students of the Wikipedia:India Education Program project as part of their (still ongoing) course-work. Unfortunately, many of the edits in this program so far have been identified as plain copy-jobs from books and online resources and therefore had to be reverted. See the India Education Program talk page for details. In order to maintain the WP standards and policies, let's all have a careful eye on this and other related articles to ensure that no material violating copyrights remains in here. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 12:34, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
I came here to get an idea of neo-keynesian economics. I find the article quite confusing. Terms are often not defined, relationship between theories (supports ? oppose ?) or theories with scientists, are not always defined. As a Wikipedian I recognize the work done, but this article need better synthesis, wording, pedagogy. Please, help if you have the relevant expertise and knowledge. Yug (talk) 14:47, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
This article was the subject of an educational assignment at Symbiosis School of Economics supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from ((IEP assignment))
by PrimeBOT (talk) on 20:10, 1 February 2023 (UTC)