The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. Ifconsensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[Institutional Revolutionary Party#:~:text=The Institutional Revolutionary Party (Spanish,, PNR), then as the|PRI]]
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors
Please make page: flexible economic model, economic eclecticism[edit]
Most Western countries are flexible with some inertia after the change in conditions.
They might exhibit even Keynesianism while maintaining neoliberalism. Actually governments adjust the percentages of eclecticism. We are supposed to (also) write what actually happens, and not only present idealized theories.
Recent edits by unconstructive WP:SPA's have crammed in massive amounts of WP:OFFTOPIC material that reads more like a school project rather than an encyclopedic entry [1]. One of them is edit warring and not discussing their edits on talk as requested in my edit summaries. I propose the article be rolled back to the last clean version before their first edits. I would do this myself but don't wish to edit war.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 16:12, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry. The version from May 2 is the one I was suggesting we roll back to. As it stands now, this subsection is by far the largest in the article. The vast majority of this material is superfluous and not needed. What is of value can be restored incrementally. Edit: And for further clarification I would only roll back that subsection on the Middle East and not the whole article, as the subsequent copy edits by user-duck et al have improved the quality of the article.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 17:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Also it looks like there were over 20 edits by other experienced editors including @User-duck: and @Cdjp1: after that date. Their input would be good to get on this. North8000 (talk) 17:04, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Roll back is the easy way out for someone who does not want to do the work. I saw the warring but it is outside the scope of what I am doing, which is too improve the presentation of the material by copy editing. Since I am not a "subject matter expert" (I do not know what they are called by wikipedians, I had to look up SPA), I do not know what is "off topic". I am sure it would take less time to remove the material then I (User-duck) and Cdjp1 have spent cleaning up the cites and referencing. Thanks, @North8000: for pinging me. User-duck (talk) 17:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm pretty much with User-duck on this, I know no-where near enough around the section under discussion to comment on it's viability, and mainly just come to this article to tidy up referencing. If a roll-back is the easiest way to do things, I'll just come back afterwards to tidy up the referencing again. Sorry I can't be of more help. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 13:58, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I agree that the section is much larger than it should be for the top level Neoliberalism article. It is also written in the style of person expounding on the topic rather than an encyclopedia covering the topic. It also looks like it could use a copyvio check and one for robot generation. Some feedback from the editors who put this in might be good on those questions and on helping pare it down. Otherwise maybe the section should be reverted as you suggest and interested editors can put a smaller amount of enclyclopedic material back in. Also noting that the two accounts/editors were both created Feb 9th 2023. North8000 (talk) 18:08, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It looks like pretty much the whole article (declined as being essaylike) at Draft:Neoliberalism in the Middle East and North Africa was dropped in here without trying to size it appropriately for this article. North8000 (talk) 18:40, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Just to clarify, C.J. Griffins proposal is to revert that ONE SUBSECTION to the May 2nd versionNorth8000 (talk) 15:54, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I did that. North8000 (talk) 20:01, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
With regards to this topic when coming to learn some basic information on what neoliberalism is. Instead, the entire article is a word salad which may be of interest to someone with a PhD in Political Science. But to the average reader it's just reams of mush, with off page links to almost everything except the one part of the salad which is indecipherable: "pejorative valence". Editors please remember this wiki is read by people of all levels and topics should be of value to each. Kairho(talk) 09:32, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Greetings, Today while working on article de-orphaning, I found article Neoliberalism in the Middle East & North Africa that looks like content of
Neoliberalism (MENA) section here. Temporarily I added a "Further" tag pointing to that MENA article. Any
one is welcome to change that Further to "Main" instead. Perhaps content here can be condensed, as the MENA section here is already tagged as too long & excess detail. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 18:04, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
See above. Looks like they went straight to article space after getting declined at AFC. I have no problem with that, it looks like it should be an article. But I think we should zap it out of this one. North8000 (talk) 19:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Quinn Slobodian contains an incomplete yet overly detailed summary of a book by that author, Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism, much of which probably belongs here if anywhere. Mporter (talk) 20:26, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=small}
