This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anthropology High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles  High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Ethnic groups High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles  High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks: Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks: Meta-tasks: Place the ((Ethnic groups)) template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project. Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution: Category:Unassessed Ethnic groups articles Category:Ethnic groups articles needing merge action Category:Ethnic groups articles needing infoboxes Category:Ethnic groups articles needing reassessment Category:Ethnic groups articles needing attention Iyer Peruvian people Start an article: Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks. Malaysia High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles  High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Orang Asli was the Malaysian collaboration of the month for February 2008. For details on improvements made to the article, see history of past collaborations. Malaysian WikiProject

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article contains a translation of Оранг-аслі from uk.wikipedia. (1017388561 et seq.)

Most of the links in the Demography section are broken, save for one, which is a page in Malay. Nyoome (talk) 05:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Should this page be upgraded to B-Class. It's more comprehensive now.Wai Hong (talk) 08:14, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ya, seems to be a B-class article now. kawaputra^torque 09:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The image Image:Mmsia1.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:17, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Orang asli not getting the rights of bumiputera has always seemed an unfairness to me and while my personal viewpoint is irrelevant, I added a section on the lack of recognition from the source alway used in the article. AFAIK, Orang Asli also don't get any of the benefits of the NEP, no quotas etc. There are perhaps bigger issues but perhaps worthy of more mention in the article. I believe SUHAKAM has argued that orang asli should receive recognition in the constititution but couldn't find mention of this in the source used in Bumiputera (Malaysia) (See Talk:Bumiputera (Malaysia)#Constitution/SUHAKAM) so haven't added this for now. There's some interesting comments in the source we use at [1] from Mahathir and TAR which could perhaps be incorporate in the article (and are probably better then the unsourced claims of the Malay view) but I wasn't sure how to do so as the comments are specifically reflecting on them being bumiputera at the section is about.

BTW SUHAKAM generally is probably a decent source for issues relating to orang asli rights and the like. For example [2] mentions that they're currently preparing a report due for release in mid 2010.

Nil Einne (talk) 17:40, 26 April 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Malaysian constitution doesn't use the word "bumiputra", rather it uses more specific definitions; it defines only "Malay" and "indigenous peoples" (Article 160(2)), "natives" of Sarawak (161A(6)(a)), and "natives" of Sabah (Article 161A(6)(b)). The "indigenous people" undoubtedly refers to Orang Asli, and as such, they are entitled to the same rights as the Malay and natives of Sabah and Sarawak. Your perception that orang asli doesn't receive constitutional recognition is something that comes out of your ignorance of the constitution itself. Maybe because during the time you wrote that comment, there was lack of content on the Bumiputra comment page. In practice, the orang asli has always been eligible for their special rights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.164.46 (talk) 14:25, 28 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The term Orang Asal is a self-identification term that encompasses all indigenous people of Malaysia, whether in the Peninsular or in Borneo. Orang Asli OTOH is a specific term that refers to the indigenous people of Peninsular Malaysia only. The redirect of Orang Asal to this page might require some review. - Bob K | Talk 06:03, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"as with their help, the Malayan army was able to defeat the communist insurgents" doesn't sound right. This conflict was fought largely by British and Commonwealth forces. --163.119.172.226 (talk) 13:38, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Orang Asli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mstar.com.my/artikel/?file=%2F2009%2F10%2F5%2Fmstar_manusia_peristiwa%2F20091005145920
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.coac.org.my/codenavia/portals/coacv2/code/main/main_art.php?parentID=11374494101180&artID=11432750280711
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110317121532/http://www.thesundaily.com/article.cfm?id=58804 to http://www.thesundaily.com/article.cfm?id=58804

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:23, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]