South America: Argentina / Chile / Colombia / Ecuador / Peru / Venezuela C‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Argentina (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Chile (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Colombia (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Ecuador (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Peru (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Venezuela (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in South America may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in South America may be able to help!

Survived votes for deletion, see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Pan-American Highway (route). Mikkalai 02:58, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

It should be noted for anyone that tries to clean up this mess that the part from Guiria to central Colombia is not the mainline of the Highway; make sure to read through the route description on Pan-American Highway. --SPUI 03:05, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

The South American par of the Pan-american Hw. don't star in Venezuela, Originaly star en Colombia, cecting whit Panama, but that conectiion don't exist in Venezuela, exist a part of the pan-merican hw. but not the principal route --Pipodv(From Wikipedia:es)201.243.7.67 02:11, 30 May 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The path of the Natinal Route 9 which conducts to the city of Mendoza (capital city of the homonimous Province) is very

Please add back in if you can finish the sentence. --Viriditas | Talk 11:32, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a travel guide. (There is wikitravel for that). I am trying to turn this and the North American version into a real article - not travel tips or second-person advice. - DavidWBrooks 20:05, 2 September 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The portion of the highway on the Peru-Ecuador border was changed and does not run through Macará anymore. It now runs through Huaquillas-Aguas Verdes. Someone needs to update this to make because it now looks un-consistent with the information on the Peruvian section. --StarbucksFreak 20:13, 16 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This article was provided with references by an Unreferenced articles project volunteer on 2010-06-28. If you edit this page, please build on the good work by citing your sources.

Pluma, who seems to be a well-respected Wikipedian, questionably edited this article in November. This page had been tagged with the Copy edit template for some time, and Pluma proceeded to copy edit. After the completion of said copy editing, Pluma added the Overly detailed template and then proceeded to remove a large amount of content from the article, then altogether redirect the article to the article Pan-American Highway.

Pluma provided what seemed to be reasonable edit summaries for these edits, so I'm not sure how to approach this one. I have reverted the edits that removed content, in hopes that someone more experienced than I can determine which of these edits were warranted, and maybe figure out what, if anything, Pluma should be notified of regarding this matter. Doggitydogs (talk) 07:49, 1 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]