GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: HundenvonPenang (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 09:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC) Reviewing per request. I hope I'll have enough time to look thoroughly.[reply]

Preliminary spot checks

Lead

More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 09:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey ZKang123. Glad to see your feedback. Will be making amendments as we go along. hundenvonPG (talk) 12:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History

More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More to come for the subsequent sections. Please bear in mind to provide page numbers for book sources.--ZKang123 (talk) 05:24, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Geography

Continued.

More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 12:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Governance and politics

Demographics

. More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 03:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 02:14, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Economy

More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 05:45, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·