This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: South Pacific This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force Australia: Military history Start‑class Low‑importance Plan Beersheba is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Recent further changes will include PMVs and M113s going back to the Infantry Battalions, with one motorized and mechanized bn per Bde. An extra cavalry squadron will be raised by each ACR for brigade reconnaissance. Details available below:

• Holloway, John (15 June 2017). "Combat Brigades Embrace Changes". Army: The Soldiers' Newspaper (1398 ed.). Canberra: Department of Defence. p. 11. ISSN 0729-5685.

I'm I bit busy at the moment so I'll post this here for later use (happy if someone beats me to it though of cse). Anotherclown (talk) 03:27, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• • Yeah the revised model of creating a mech infantry bn and motorised infantry bn per brigade, plus 2 RAR going to 1 Div, were known as 'Plan Keogh' I believe, which was sort of an update on Beersheba. It would be worth a write up if anyone has interest and time. --TinTin (talk) 06:35, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A possible source for expansion of the article:

• Nakra, Daksh (6 November 2017). "Australian Army completes restructuring under Plan Beersheba". Janes 360. Retrieved 11 November 2017.

Anotherclown (talk) 09:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC) Nick-D, AustralianRupert, talk page stalkers, I have just learned that 1 Armd Regt has been moved *back* down to Edinburgh, though the MBTs have also been sent to the other brigades. Was there a public explanation as to why no tank force has been retained in the Northern Territory? Buckshot06 (talk) 06:48, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

G'day, IMO it was ostensibly done to negate the difficulties of training with heavy vehicles in the wet season. Cultana is more suitable for year-round activities: [1]. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:48, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think that there was also some discussion of this on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute's blog and/or reports - they've had a focus on ADF forces stationed in northern Australia. Nick-D (talk) 10:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]