POV[edit]

This article was obviously written by subscribers to this relatively small school of Marxist thought. NPOV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.150.49.144 (talk) 20:43, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:POV#When_to_remove
You may remove this template whenever any one of the following is true:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved.
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given.
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
The anonymous author of the first post in this thread gave no specific objection, hence condition#=2 holds. Tlroche (talk) 00:50, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Neo-Marxism[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To not merge as proposed; alternative appropach have some support but no consensus. Klbrain (talk) 20:27, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Neo-Marxism. I hesitantly consider , perhasp they're the same thig? this page explicitly says 'neo-Narxst' FatalSubjectivities (talk) 16:58, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Political Marxism seems mostly attached to Brenner, while Neo-Marxism encompasses at least Political Marxism and also the Frankfurt School that inspired it. This article is short and not likely to see much expansion, so merging would be viable, but not necessary. The Neo-Marxism article should say probably say more about Political Marxism. It might be worth considering merging Brenner debate into Political Marxism. Sennalen (talk) 15:16, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories