Article (edit | visual edit | history ) · Article talk (edit | history ) · Watch
Reviewer: The C of E (talk · contribs ) 08:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ]
I will review this. The C of E God Save the King! (talk ) 08:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ]
Sorry for the delay, real life stuff getting in the way, I'll try to get it done on the weekend. The C of E God Save the King! (talk ) 09:13, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ]
No rush. Echetus X e 16:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What's the need for the mention of Crewe in the opening paragraph?
"said to have been formed in 1876", Said by whom?
"Vale were complete unknowns", why?
More detail needed about that court case
"annual Stoke v Vale", vs
Why were Vale forced to reapply?
It needs to be clarified that the Britannia Stadium and Bet365 Stadium are the same
"trashed the away end at Vale Park", formalise the language
"Dave Brammer also turned out for Crewe Alexandra after being controversially sold to Crewe", 1, WP:OLINK for Crewe already being linked earlier. And 2, why was it controversial?
Why are we mentioning the rivalry with Crewe in the players for both clubs section?
WP:OLINK on John Rudge
Source 2, publisher title shouldn't be italicised as its not a print source and shouldn't be a bare web address
Source 36, publisher title needs spacing
Source 107 needs an access date.
Source 111, needs a proper title and has a bare address as a publisher
@EchetusXe : It looks in pretty good shape. Just need those issues pointed out fixed, then please ping me and I'll have another look. The C of E God Save the King! (talk ) 07:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ]
-Thanks, I've looked at those.@The C of E : --Echetus X e 00:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ]