This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Germany Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Women's History Stub‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles Stub This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Biography: Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article contains a translation of Wilhelmine Luise von Baden from de.wikipedia.

I think, this isn't stub class anymore. Besides, she's isn't much of a interesting person, now isnt she? -The Bold Guy- 11:24, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is this a correct image? The date say it is from 1810, but she is dressed in the fashion of the 1780s-1790s, when Wilhelmine, born in 1788, could not be an adult as she is in the portrait. This can not be a correct image. Perhaps it is a mix up?--Aciram (talk) 14:00, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There seems to be a conflict between English and German as to whether she acquired Heiligenberg in 1820 or in 1827. The sources on this page point to her purchasing it in 1820, but the official German website, and German Wikipedia entry with its sources, states that this occurred in 1827. Unfortunately, I don't have access to the sources mentioned to see where the discrepancy comes from. - LessRekkless (talk) 18:02, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've read some sources and would agree to change the year of the Heiligenberg acquisition from 1820 to 1827 Puta la wea mala (talk) 16:20, 8 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]