This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history. Politics: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force.

was he right to ignore the french after all they've done in the Revolutionary war? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.113.48.10 (talk) 19:26, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The claim that Jefferson resigned over this proclamation is not accurate. He stayed on as Secretary of State long after this. Reference is needed for this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:E:2680:3CD:7CB5:ECFA:C047:309 (talk) 21:53, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article implies that the war was started by revolutionary France. But the War of the First Coalition was started by European monarchies in support of King Louis, to prevent popular uprisings from sympathizers in their own lands.

This article is factually misleading if not inaccurate, and broadly supports the Non-Neutral Hamiltonian-Federalist (and by now, broadly American) POV that its declaration of "neutrality" in this case was something other than a support of the status quo European monarchies trying to put down a democratic revolution in France.

[in support of its hypocritical and now traditional practice of supporting dictatorships and autocracies abroad while claiming to be a "city on a hill" and light of democracy.] Although those were my own words, the research can be done and reliable commentators on this can be quoted. The Girondist POV of Ambassador Genet ought to be presented in the lede, along with the reply of Madison / Helvidius speaking for the Democratic-Republicans in support of revolutionary France, and the possibility considered that America's declaration was a betrayal of the Treaty of Alliance (1778) with France, and of its own democratic principles. Regards, Jaredscribe (talk) 23:20, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

None of these wikilinks or background history was in the article. This bias toward 1793 "Recentism" suggests that wikipedia's well known systemic bias toward "Recentism" extends beyond our hypermediated present, into realms of the past obscured by the "cutting" of history, a trend in post-WWII academic history writing championed by Foucault and other post-modernists. Jaredscribe (talk) 23:50, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do want to note that according to the Wikipedia article on the War of the First Coalition, it was the French General Assembly that declared actual war first, which at least technically supports Hamilton's claims. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.208.123.119 (talk) 03:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

punctuation is needed 64.98.89.49 (talk) 23:26, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

jk good punctuation 64.98.89.49 (talk) 23:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Without providing Madison's argument equal space to Hamilton's, this article comes across as pro-monarchist and pro-Hamilton. Look at the words devoted to each and it's clear. What an abominable entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.144.246.119 (talk) 15:39, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]