This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Progressivism in the United States article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 40 days

Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Politics: American Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance). United States: History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as Mid-importance). Philosophy: Social and political Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Social and political philosophy

The article gives the impression that 20th-century progressive ideals around immigration and eugenics were not necessarily major planks in the progressive reform agenda. However, the consensus from the academic sources strongly emphasizes that immigration and eugenics were the rule and not the exception, were intimately tied to the movements desire for 'purity' and 'cleanliness', and were widely revered within the movement.

Sources about progressivism, immigration, and eugenics: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20148471, https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvc77cqn, https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34506, DenverCoder9 (talk) 00:48, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t forget about nativism. Look up Theodore Roosevelt views on hyphenated Americans Zyxrq (talk) 06:10, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have performed removal of content from the lead section, largely unsourced, and part of it totally not covered anywhere in the page. One and only source what was present in my content removal didn't correspond to the text attributed to that source. Added clearly correlated and sourced content, and everything was explained in my edit summaries, pretty detailed. We here does not make any advocacy, promotion or write what our personal opinions and stances are or how we see some things. Politician Bernie Sanders photo is just moved to the section "In the 21st century" covering his contributing to a progressive shift within the Democratic Party since the 2010's, and that is that century. And whole progressivism in the United States is much older and not for that century just, so his photo is not wide and does not cover whole movement and whole history of it. Nubia86 (talk) 21:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Progressivism in the United States is a political philosophy and reform movement. Historically in the United States it generally expressed itself with both right-wing and left-wing politics, such as social democracy, progressive conservatism, social justice new nationalism, and even eugenics. Zyxrq (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The lead conflates four separate movements and assumes a coherent ideology, which is misleading. TFD (talk) 15:19, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I pasificly wrote it to show progressivism isn’t a coherent ideology and based on what the article says itself. The four separate movements are historical and modern examples of what progressives supported. I don’t see how that is misleading. Could you elaborate. Also if you have any ideas on how to improve what I wrote please share. Zyxrq (talk) 16:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]