A fact from Prussian Army appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 February 2007. The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the standing army created during the Thirty Years' War by Frederick William, Elector of Brandenburg, developed into the Prussian Army? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/February.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Former countries: Prussia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles This article is within the scope of WikiProject Prussia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive. Germany High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: European / German / Early Modern / Napoleonic era / World War I C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  European military history task force German military history task force Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800) Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815) World War I task force

This article contains a translation of Preußischee Armee from de.wikipedia. Translated on 25 January 2006.

There is an article which was started about a year after this one called Royal Prussian Army of the Napoleonic Wars. It seems to me to be an article that has run out of steam. I have just been through it and cut and pasted the same text as was originally copied without attribution from the article Military mobilisation during the Hundred Days, to improve links citations etc.

If the text from Military mobilisation during the Hundred Days is stripped out, it seems to me, from a quick glance at the citations used in this article, that most of the rest of the text comes from this article. So as far as I can tell as most of the sections in the copied article are devoid of text, we may as well remove the content of the article Royal Prussian Army of the Napoleonic Wars and redirect it to the section in this article called Napoleonic era as currently the copied article is a content fork. If in the future the section "Napoleonic era" gets too large and needs to have a WP:Summary style article then it can be reverted back into an article and linked from the top of the "Napoleonic era" section.

As I am not an active editor on either article, I will leave the decision to someone who edits here on whether to redirect or not. The editor who originally spun off the article has been indefinably blocked, and the only other significant addition to the article was this edit by 79.47.50.164 but the additional text was not sourced. So I do not see the need for merge templates disfiguring this article. Be bold and see if anyone objects. -- PBS (talk) 00:41, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

[Quote:] "the close fellow of King Frederick, Hans Karl von Winterfeldt,"

Curious expression (the close fellow); not such good English. Close friend/close associate perhaps? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.41.155.162 (talk) 21:38, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MattRyanPace (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by MattRyanPace (talk) 22:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]