This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Psychoanalysis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 6 months

This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Medicine: Psychiatry Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force (assessed as High-importance).

This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of October 17, 2007.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Psychoanalysis. PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles) The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine. Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Ruling on "Pseudoscience" The Arbitration Committee has issued several rulings on guidelines for the presentation of material that might be labeled "pseudoscience". Relevant to this article: Questionable science: Theories which have a substantial following, such as psychoanalysis, but which some critics allege to be pseudoscience, may contain information to that effect, but generally should not be so characterized.

Convention Please post new messages at the bottom of the page to prevent confusion. Make sure to sign your comments by pressing the second-to-last button above the edit box, or by typing out ~~~~ at the end of your comment. See: Welcome to Wikipedia, FAQ, Wikiquette, Be nice, and Talk page guidelines.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 November 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Chelsc.an (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Chelsc.an (talk) 06:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Focus on only Treatment, Training, Research and Effectiveness sections — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chelsc.an (talk • contribs) 21:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Peer feedback:

- Great job updating/adding citations & clarifying existing sections of the article

- Could consider adding how modern psychotherapy & psychiatry interact in treatment section

- Could consider adding more up-to-date perspectives on the effectiveness of psychotherapy, it seems like the most current cited research is from 2012/2013 The-GOAT-of-GOATs (talk) 18:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Course Day 2

Choose topic and submit 2 references

Class teams meeting Work plans Monday 11-27

Week 2:

- Complete work plan draft - Read through article thoroughly and note references that are not secondary for editing. - Identify key missing details in article then add from secondary references cited

Class Teams meeting Work in progress Friday 12/1

Week 2-3:

- Make sure links for citations in article work - Identify sources that are biased and mark for editing - Continue to identify key missing details from article and add from secondary sources cited - Peer editing Class Teams meeting Work in progress Wed 12/6

Week 3-4:

- Review language used and ensure doctor jargon has not been used - Compare article with secondary source – are there viewpoints/sub-topics that are overemphasized/underemphasized? - Ensure that wiki links to other pages have B grading or higher - Continue Peer editing. Class Teams meeting Work in progress Monday 12-11

Week 4 (Final week):

- With peer edits – respond and review articles chosen and information added for accuracy and simplicity. - Have at least 2 – 3 peer feedback at this point. Chelsc.an (talk) 21:06, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]