GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Purple shore crab/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Thebiguglyalien (talk · contribs) 18:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bear with me, I haven't reviewed any biology articles before. I mostly took it because who can say no to a face like this. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 18:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Just a few minor things need to be addressed for it to meet the GA criteria. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:53, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Criteria 1 and 3 are now met. All that needs to be addressed is criterion 2 with the one text-source integrity comment and some of the close paraphrasing (at least the one about Nucella lamellosa). Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Thebiguglyalien That should be everything, please let me know if there's anything else. Thanks again for doing this. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 15:22, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well-written
 Done, cut. The sentence implies causation but in reality these were meant to be two separate thoughts. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 21:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Slightly Reworded. The source only states: They contribute greatly to keeping the beaches clean by scavenging. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 21:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On later review I just cut this entirely. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 21:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done 🏵️Etrius ( Us)
 Done 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 21:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 21:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 21:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Verifiable with no original research

Sourcing is consistent and most sources seem generally reliable. What makes NW Marine Life reliable?

NW Marine is a database of species in the NW coast of the US. I've cut the source since it only sites one small factoid.

Spotchecks:

 Done Added additional citation
 Done Reworded 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 15:18, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Additional citations added
 Done Slightly reworded for posterity's sake
Broad in its coverage
The only source I can find on this is Northern Bush Craft, I'm unsure how reliable it is and all it claims is that they are edible. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 21:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done cut 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 21:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral

No undue viewpoints or focus.

Stable

Appears stable.

Illustrated

Images are all Creative Commons or public domain.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 20:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Etriusus (talk). Self-nominated at 00:52, 23 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Purple shore crab; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

@Dumelow and Etriusus: Technicality regarding ALT0 - the reference states: "Female may carry from 400 to 36,000 eggs". So carry, not lay - by my reading. Bruxton (talk) 20:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]